Power and Accountability

Mike J. Masoud
July 17, 2020

A mismatch between power and accountability is a primary driver of corruption. It undermines the integrity of the governance system. It also erodes public trust in the country’s institutions and provides a prone environment for radicalization. It only deepens the roots of corruption.

But, what kind of power we talk about, and who grants such power? Before I proceed in-depth, I discuss “Power and Accountability” as the 5th principle of fighting corruption issued by The American Anti-Corruption Institute (AACI).

Power

It is all kinds of power irrespective of its origin. For example, It could be spiritual, religious, political, social, economic, technological, or legal. The public official has the power of his public office. The spiritual leader gains his power from both his religion and what the law allows him to do. The constitution, the consolidated will of the people, provides the capability to govern. In a democracy, there are three branches of governance: legislative, executive, and judiciary. Each of these branches has its power.

Power is a result of a contractual agreement between those who exercise power and the other contracting party. Ultimately, it is a principal-agent relationship. In the civil state, people are the source of power who shall always have civil ways to protect, maintain, and restore it.

Power must be defined clearly. It is called power if and only if it is accountable. Otherwise, it is called corruption.

Accountability

Without exception, each citizen, who uses power, shall be accountable to his actions based on using such a power. For example, when a public official uses his public office for personal enrichment and is not being sued, he is corrupt. Accountability is the set of expectations or consequences of using entrusted power- each citizen must justify the sources of his wealth.

In developing countries, it is not uncommon to find a mismatch of power and accountability. In most cases, those who are charged with governance are not accountable for their public office. As a result, the corruption mechanisms in these countries match such a style of power and accountability. I call it a masked corruption. It is the most severe corruption types worldwide.

Matching Power with Accountability

There is not a cut and optimal dry solution. It depends, among many other factors, on management, legal, cultural, and social variables. At all times, the design of accountability should be known, public, legal, and within the applicable rules, laws, and regulations.

Public officials should not fear to make decisions; they must fear gross negligence when they make decisions. Though power corrupts, it must always be accountable to deter and prevent corruption.

Originally published at https://blog.theaaci.com on July 17, 2020.

--

--

--

CACM, CFE, MBA. Senior Director in the Middle East and Africa of The American Anti-Corruption Institute (AACI).

Love podcasts or audiobooks? Learn on the go with our new app.

Recommended from Medium

Why the 2020 Election Is About So Much More Than Just “Politics” — Claiming Crip

Why White Supremacy Thrives in the “Marketplace of Ideas”

The Republican War on America’s REAL History

Capital Punishment in the Us — Overview

Instead Of The Same — Old, Public Officials Need To Be CREATIVE!

Beto O’Rourke and the Privilege of Public Rage

The Pandemic Stole My Last Teenage Year: Here Are My Takeaways

Get the Medium app

A button that says 'Download on the App Store', and if clicked it will lead you to the iOS App store
A button that says 'Get it on, Google Play', and if clicked it will lead you to the Google Play store
Mike Masoud, CACM, CFE, MBA

Mike Masoud, CACM, CFE, MBA

CACM, CFE, MBA. Senior Director in the Middle East and Africa of The American Anti-Corruption Institute (AACI).

More from Medium

Shape culture through practice

The Relevance of Reverence in Education

The defensive leader: 3 questions before you ‘coast into retirement’

What Does It Mean To Mourn in America?

An illustration of a woman with her back facing the viewer in the middle of a dusty pink suburban living room asking, “Hmm… Now Why Did I Come In Here Again?”. The year 1957 posted in the top left corner. An image of a black cat walking in the foreground is shown with the year 1999 above it.